•0 reads
Federal Government Increases Capital Gains Inclusion Rate, Sparking Economic Debate
The Canadian federal government has announced a significant change to its tax policy, increasing the capital gains inclusion rate from one-half to two-thirds. This new rate will apply to annual gains exceeding $250,000 for individuals and to all capital gains for corporations and trusts, effective June 25, 2024. The government projects this will generate over $19 billion in revenue over five years, intended to fund housing and social programs. The move has drawn sharp criticism from business groups, doctors, and technology leaders, who warn it will stifle investment and innovation in Canada.
Ottawa Announces Major Shift in Capital Gains Taxation
The federal government has unveiled a significant policy change that will alter how capital gains are taxed in Canada, a move it frames as a step towards greater "tax fairness." As detailed in the 2024 federal budget, the capital gains inclusion rate—the portion of a capital gain that is subject to tax—will increase from 50% to 66.67% (two-thirds). The new rules are set to take effect on June 25, 2024.
For individuals, the change is structured with a threshold. The current 50% inclusion rate will continue to apply to the first $250,000 of capital gains realized annually. Any gains above this amount will be subject to the new two-thirds inclusion rate. However, for corporations and all types of trusts, the new two-thirds rate will apply to all capital gains realized, with no minimum threshold. The government estimates that this change will affect only a small percentage of the wealthiest Canadians while having a broader impact on all Canadian corporations realizing capital gains.
Government's Rationale: Funding Priorities and Fairness
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland has defended the policy as a necessary measure to fund key government priorities, including housing, healthcare, and clean technology initiatives. The government projects the tax change will generate an additional $19.4 billion in revenue over the next five years. The core argument from Ottawa is one of generational fairness, suggesting that it is inequitable for an individual earning income through wages to be taxed at a higher marginal rate than someone earning income through capital investments.
The government has emphasized that the majority of Canadians will not be affected. According to federal data, only about 0.13% of individuals, with an average income of $1.4 million, are expected to pay more in personal income tax on their capital gains in any given year. The principal residence exemption, a cornerstone of Canadian tax policy that allows homeowners to sell their primary home tax-free, remains untouched by these changes.
To mitigate some impact on entrepreneurs, the government also announced an increase in the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption (LCGE) for the sale of qualified small business corporation shares and farming or fishing property. The LCGE will rise from approximately $1 million to $1.25 million, and will be indexed to inflation thereafter.
Widespread Criticism from Business and Professional Sectors
Despite the government's framing, the announcement has been met with swift and strong opposition from a wide range of sectors across the Canadian economy. Critics argue that the policy will have a chilling effect on investment, entrepreneurship, and Canada's overall economic competitiveness.
Business organizations, including the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), have been particularly vocal. They contend that the higher tax rate disincentivizes risk-taking and long-term investment, which are critical for economic growth. Entrepreneurs who build a business over many years often rely on its eventual sale as their primary source of retirement funds. A higher tax on that one-time capital gain, critics argue, punishes this long-term effort.
The technology and innovation sector has also raised alarms. Many startups and tech companies use stock options as a key tool to attract and retain top talent in a competitive global market. Because stock option benefits are often taxed as a capital gain, this policy change makes Canadian firms less competitive compared to their U.S. counterparts, potentially leading to a brain drain of skilled workers.
Impact on Incorporated Professionals
One of the most organized opposition groups has been incorporated professionals, particularly medical doctors. The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) has stated that the change will severely impact physicians. Many doctors in Canada are not employees with pension plans but operate as independent contractors through a professional corporation. They use their corporations to save for retirement, invest in equipment, and manage their practice's finances. Since these savings are often invested and generate capital gains within the corporation, the new two-thirds inclusion rate directly reduces their ability to save for retirement, potentially exacerbating the ongoing shortage of physicians in the country.
Economic Implications and Political Calculus
Economists are divided on the long-term effects. While the immediate revenue gain is clear, the potential for behavioural changes—such as investors moving capital to lower-tax jurisdictions or delaying the sale of assets—could erode some of the projected gains. The policy could also depress business valuations and make it more difficult for owners to sell their businesses, impacting succession planning for thousands of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Politically, the move is seen as an attempt by the governing Liberal party to draw a sharp contrast with the opposition Conservatives on the issue of economic fairness ahead of the next federal election. By targeting a policy change that primarily affects high-income earners and corporations, the government is reinforcing its narrative of supporting the middle class. The Conservative opposition has strongly condemned the tax increase, framing it as a tax on innovation, farmers, and doctors that will ultimately harm the Canadian economy.
As the June 25 implementation date approaches, the debate continues to intensify. While the government remains firm on its position, the sustained pressure from multiple sectors highlights the deep divisions over how to balance fiscal needs with economic incentives in Canada.
Insights
- Why it matters: This represents one of the most significant shifts in Canadian tax policy in decades. It fundamentally alters the incentive structure for investment and savings for corporations and high-income individuals, aiming to redistribute the tax burden to fund social spending.
- Impact on Canada: The immediate impact will be increased tax revenue for the federal government. However, the long-term effects could include reduced venture capital investment, challenges for talent retention in key sectors like technology, and potential difficulties for small business succession planning. It may also impact the retirement savings of incorporated professionals, such as doctors and lawyers.
- What to watch: Key developments to watch include the final legislative details, the market's reaction after the June 25 implementation date, and data on capital flows in and out of Canada in the coming quarters. The policy is also set to become a major point of contention in the next federal election campaign.